I decided to see if I could get around this by loading the images on to the computer and altering
the background, cutting out the unrealistic part and replacing it with something else.
The four pictures included here show 'before and after' examples. I have chosen four views without trains,
as I wanted to see if there was enough interest in the pictures without a train being present.
It is also a very good way of assessing how well a scene has been modelled, as the camera picks up
imperfections that you don't notice while looking at the layout itself.
I took the pictures here by standing the camera on the layout, either on the track or another surface;
this eliminates any shake which could spoil the image, and gives a realistic viewpoint. I was using an
Olympus compact camera, which is small enough to take views that cannot normally be seen, as you could
not physically get your head to that point. For more distant shots, a tripod is recommended.
No lighting was used other than the daylight bulbs in the layout lights and the natural background.
I turned off the flash on the camera, hence the longer time taken to record the image and the need to
steady the camera.
The four images chosen here illustrate well the problems you face, and show how to get around them
quite simply. I have a series of photographs stored on my computer that are simply landscapes,
taken at different times of year and with different skies, but without much foreground detail.
These are used to replace the unwanted part of the model photograph.
The software I use is quite old now, Livepix, which was designed originally for Windows 95.
I am familiar with it, and it does all I need, although more modern programs such as
Adobe Photoshop
are more flexible.
Looking first at the photograph of the church seen across the river, the picture is spoilt by the
very messy background, and the foreground is out of focus. The buildings are hardly noticeable against
the roof and the people looking at the layout. The first job, then, is to remove the unwanted area by
using the 'cutting' tool on the computer screen, tracing round the area to be removed until it is
surrounded, and then clicking the mouse. Magically, the unwanted part vanishes, and the part of the
image to be kept remains against a white screen. It is a bit complicated cutting around chimneys and
so forth, but enlarging the image helps.
The next job is to choose an appropriate sky / countryside background, and insert it into the picture
so that it lies behind the model image. It can be moved around until it lines up, and several can be tried
until the best is found. I wanted a fairly neutral image here as the model was the important thing.
When the background was in place, I next blurred the edge of the cut-out model picture as a stark line
looked wrong; slight blurring makes the two images blend together and appear as one.
It is possible to increase the brightness, or alter the colour balance, but I was happy with the picture
as it stood. I added a simple green frame and that was that.
Some may argue that this is cheating, and that a picture should be left alone, but I am not trying to
pretend that this is an image of the layout as it really is. I just wanted to make a photo of the model
look as realistic as possible for my own pleasure. To me, it certainly gives a feeling of distance,
far more so than in the original picture.
The second picture shows a view in the other direction, looking under the footbridge with the
signalbox on the left. Again, the original has a blurred foreground and although the background is
less intrusive it is not realistic. I wanted to alter this, but it was complicated by the fact that
part of the background is viewed through the footbridge, and another section is behind the box.
Three separate cut-out operations had to be done before dropping in a suitably bland sky that would
not draw attention from the models. In this case it was difficult to blur the model image because of
the signalbox and the bridge, so this was not done. With man-made objects for the join between the
two images, a sharp line looks okay.